Always worth revisiting this topic: Rangefinders vs. SLRs. Read an easy to follow discussion here at
The Darkroom. Fair and doesn't take sides. In the end, your choice depends on what you are shooting and why. Click on the links below to see example images for each camera type in my Camera Evolution.
If you have followed this blog for a while, you know that I made the switch from 35 mm to medium format 645 (largely before I started the blog). I still use 35mm, but over time the Minolta posts have gone down and the Mamiya 645 posts have gone up. The Mamiya 645, though, is still a single lens reflex camera (SLR), meaning basically that you view, focus and meter through the same lens.
One of my many
Minoltas:
I had a small
Canonet 35 mm Rangefinder, but never really took to it:
Then my husband read about the
Mamiya 6X6 and wanted one. So we got one. Then it sat around for a while because he was more focussed on digital and so I started using it. Of course he then wanted it back!
I'd learned the ins and outs of Rangefinders by then and was ready to take the plunge. I had observed photographers using the
Mamiya 6X7 on workshops and field trips. And since I prefer the landscape format to the square, the Mamiya 7 became my rangefinder of choice.
But I found, that although a Canonet Rangefinder might serve well for street photography, the 10-shot per roll M7 didn't quite work. So in my camera evolution (any by learning a lot about different camera options on the 52 rolls project). I acquired the
Fuji GA645 for medium format street photography. We've already taken this on out for a spin at recent rally's. I can't wait for Zombie Crawl 2017!
And yet, I still find uses for my 35 mm cameras, for special projects, as as my easy access ride along camera on road trips. And now that I know more about Rangefinders, I use the Canonet more.
In a future Saturday Online offering, we'll take a look at some Experimental Cameras I Have Known.........