data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90341/90341af06027dd062ed5009ac750076bdaa51048" alt=""
Let's Call this a bit of 'Alternate Digital Processing'. Quite by accident I scanned these transparencies on the 'reflective' setting, with some interesting results. Which one's do you like best, the alternative scans or the correct scans?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66851/668515b3cba4c6beb20eeee8d196df8ebcf5aeaf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c03a/9c03a605e7f03349003e56f6fdba237aa48ca3a7" alt=""
Taken with the Mamiya 6 Rangefinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8937/d8937be8840aefd3510bfc03e737eceda7185658" alt=""
I always think that Nature doesn't need digital improvement - and then I start playing around with Picasa...
ReplyDeleteDigital play does work out sometimes. In this case I think it did. It was dark, the lighting bad (actually snowing as I was shooting). I think the 'mistakes' make it a bit more interesting. I'll post more next week. I actually scanned three rolls of film before I realized what I had done.
ReplyDelete